“Runaway” productions are on the rise in Hollywood and Los Angeles, meaning productions that do not shoot in this collective location, so film production or “Hollywood” are no longer confined to Los Angeles. According to a Hollywood Reporter article, the California economy lost $7.7 billion, 28, 000 full-time and part-time jobs, and more than $350 million in the form of state and local taxes from 2015 to 2020. Increasingly, many film and television productions are choosing to shoot abroad—a phenomenon the industry calls “runaway productions.” For many countries, such as Canada, Mexico, the United Arab Emirates, and Britain, this shift presents a “golden” opportunity to do any one or more of the following:
- bolster their own economy
- cultivate their local talent
- try to build their own film infrastructure, and
- possibly cultivate any film / cultural presence of their own
Imposing restrictions on or government protection of an industry is very likely to lead to local industry stagnation and / or anti-trust practices. According to the British Film Institute, the year 2024 witnessed 65% of production in Britain coming from the five studios in Hollywood and three online platforms, meaning streaming, leading to $1.71 billion in expenditures in the British economy. Similar statistics apply to many other countries that have attracted runaway productions. With the globalization of the media industries, technology, the relative effect of streaming, “runaway” productions will rise, so it would behoove you, as a government official or film commission manager, to capitalize on them. Thus, as of 2026, the question is no longer if countries should attempt to attract “runaway” productions, but how and for the medium to long-term.
Understanding Runaway Productions
“Runaway” productions happen when film studios (such as Sony, Universal, or Disney) choose to film outside a given state in the United States or even in another country to reduce costs, get access to unique locations, or capitalize on government incentives if and when they meet a minimum of qualified expenditures. From historical epic films to “blockbuster” action films, foreign locations have been assuming greater importance in film and even local culture and identity.
Countries like Canada, Morocco, the United Kingdom, and New Zealand have already demonstrated how strategic cultural policies can affect their status and make them into production hubs or almost. Their success offers a blueprint for others.
“Runaway” Productions: Offering Competitive Financial Incentives
Tax credits, rebates, and grants are among the most effective tools governments can use to attract productions. Competitive incentive programs can significantly reduce production costs, making a country more appealing than domestic U.S. locations for shooting films and / or television shows. To accomplish that lofty goal, though, incentives need to meet several criteria:
- Transparency and consistency over time
- Stability over time (to build trust and credibility with studios or production companies)
- Realistic Structure to ensure local economic return
For example, a film commission can’t “blindly” apply an incentive plan in its city or locale when there are barely enough crew members, let alone experienced ones. “Runaways” productions definitely want the tax rebates or increased caps on hotel stays– but not at the expense of an experienced, dedicated film crew. A competitive, reliable incentive program promotes and incentivizes medium to long-term investment in the local media ecosystem, meaning not simply spontaneously attracts productions.
“Runaway” Productions: Helping Build Enduring Infrastructure
Studios and production companies need reliable infrastructure: sound stages, post-production facilities, equipment rental services, and crews. Without them, even the most generous, competitive incentives may simply not attract studios or their productions. Governments should undertake the following steps:
- Partner with private investors to build studios or possibly co-finance a production
- Promote training programs for technical roles
- Promote the growth of local production service companies
A government or even film commission can use “runaway” productions to launch an ecosystem where productions can regularly take place, which would nourish and bolster it enough that it ultimately becomes self-sustaining or where it can at least partly support its own productions. The goal would be to build and support a domestic ecosystem, not necessarily isolate it or minimize continuing “runaway” productions.
“Runaway” Productions: A Tool for Local Talent
A film industry, even one partially dependent on foreign productions or partnerships, depends on local professionals and crew members—directors, cinematographers, editors, set designers, assistants, and others. Inherent in this ecosystem is the education, vocational training, and apprenticeships, which support local talent. Accordingly, countries or film commissions that invest in education and training can reduce reliance on foreign crews– if that is one of their goals– to increase local employment and productions. Building local talent capacity encompasses:
- Film schools and vocational programs
- Apprenticeships with incoming productions
- Partnerships with international studios or productions for knowledge “transfer”
- Workshops and / or guest speakers to address the industry
So, “runaway” productions can be a boon with two edges. This not only strengthens the local media ecosystem but also creates a balance between attracting more “runaway” productions and cultivating the local talent.
“Runaway” Productions: Streamlining Processes
Time is money in media production, so bureaucratic delays and / or unclear regulations can quickly deter studios or production companies from choosing a country or locale. Accordingly, governments or film commissions can undertake these steps to set an institutional or country precedent:
- Create film commissions as umbrella shops
- Simplify permit processes
- Provide clear guidelines for filming in public spaces
- Minimize, if not eliminate, long delays
Efficiency and predictability can be as important as financial incentives.
“Runaway” Productions: Promoting Tourism
Almost any country has visually, historically, religiously, and / or artistically distinctive locations or sights to showcase—deserts, architectural landmarks, war locations, coastlines, and / or urban locales. Governments or film agencies can proactively market such “assets” so they can help attract “runaway” productions. In turn, producers or studios that utilize such authentic locations would be credible in their productions and draw more audiences. The relationship between “runaway” productions nd tourism can be a revolving door or a symbiotic one.
Film commissions can:
- Build location databases with excellent pictures
- Attend or participate in international film markets and conferences
- Host location scouts and familiarization tours
A strong visual national identity can turn a country into a recognizable “character” in global film production. Successful films or television shows can lead to a surge in tourism— a phenomenon industry experts call the “film tourism effect.” Countries can amplify this by aligning media production strategy with tourism campaigns. Examples of effective film tourism approaches:
- Promoting filming locations as tourist destinations
- Creating themed tours or experiences
- Collaborating with studios on marketing campaigns
Obviously, this extends the economic effects of “runaway” productions to far beyond the production in and by itself.
“Runaway” Productions: Ensuring Long-Term Sustainability
Attracting “runaway” media productions obviously confers strategic benefits on the media ecosystem of a country, including branding, a country should not rely on them. A balanced media ecosystem development strategy would need to encompass the twin or dual benefits of: Enough knowledge transfer and sustained local growth. Both take time, experience, and effort. This practically means:
- Funding local productions
- Supporting independent filmmakers
- Encouraging co-productions
- Encouraging enough knowledge transfer to keep raising baseline capabilities
A robust media industry should, one one hand, integrate with global industries and trends, and encourage local talents and capabilities, on the other hand.
Conclusion
Hollywood “runaway” productions are not simply a trend—they are very likely to continue due to the skyrocketing direct and indirect (ancillary) costs in Los Angeles, the rising awareness of many analysts in key locales of the importance of foreign productions, and technology and social media facilitation. If you, as a film commission or member of a government, can recognize this and act strategically on it, you can unlock significant economic and cultural benefits for your country.
By combining competitive incentives, a strong infrastructure, experienced talent, and smart governance, countries can position themselves as almost default partners in the increasingly global media and entertainment ecosystem. The rewards go far beyond the screen: jobs, investments, training, tourism, and ultimately nationhood.
You can follow news and analyses of Hollywood and the rising industry in the United Arab Emirates by subscribing to our newsletter below. We look forward to your registration and to ideally helping inform you and satisfy your curiosity about this ultracompetitive industry. You can also register as a member of this platform.